|
Debunking
Taekwon-Do Myths
Stuart Anslow is a 4th
degree black belt in Taekwon-do and is well known in the UK and
internationally. He also runs Self Protection courses for groups
associated with his local Council and is Assistant Coach for the
Harrow Borough Karate team. Stuart is a full time instructor and
was a World Gold and Silver medallist in 2000.
Stuart is a regular writer
for the UK martial arts press, having written many articles for
'Taekwon-do and Korean Martial Arts', 'Combat', 'Martial Arts Illustrated'
and 'Fighters' magazines. In October 2003, Stuart was inducted into
the world renowned Combat Magazines 'Hall Of Fame 2003' for his
work within the field of martial arts on a worldwide level.
Stuart is the author of "Ch'ang Hon
Taekwon-do Hae Sul: Real Applications To The ITF Patterns" and this
article is adapted from that book. To learn more about Stuart and
his book you can visit his website: www.raynerslanetkd.com
Debunking
Taekwon-Do Myths
by Stuart
Anslow
There are many preconceived
notions on what is and what is not part of the Ch'ang Hon system
of Taekwon-do. These are brought about by instructors or associations
teaching what and how they want, which is not in itself wrong, but
it does confuse the student sometimes. Here we explore some of those
myths as well as listing what makes Taekwon-do different from other
styles, especially its father art, Shotokan Karate.
Taekwon-do Is Mostly
Kicks:
Taekwon-do
is often cited as being mainly a kicking art, but in actual fact
is has many more hand techniques than kicks, at a guess I would
say the hand techniques out number the leg techniques by around
8 to 1 (I once read there are over 2000 hand techniques, but I've
never actually counted them to verify this).
W.T.F. (World Taekwon-do
Federation) Taekwondo helps proliferate this argument, with its
competition format scoring on virtually kicking techniques alone.
I.T.F. competition does the same thing although it scores hand techniques
more readily, kicks score more as they are considered harder to
perform. I.T.F. competitions want to promote this spectacular side
of the art as it often looks better than a slug fest using just
the hands and shows part of the technical expertise and grace that
many Taekwon-do performers have. There is nothing wrong with this
and in the main I agree with how I.T.F. based competitions are run;
as I too enjoy seeing the kickers perform. However, this is competition
and many students and especially those who do not train in Taekwon-do
can't dissimilate 'this is competition' from 'this is Taekwon-do'.
Other connotations about Taekwon-do due to its sport side are abound,
mostly from other ill informed martial artists, but if we do nothing
to change their views, including via our training methods and they
do not delve deeper than what they see in a magazine or on a video,
this misrepresentation will persist, as its up to the instructors
not the student.
Taekwon-do Is Touch
Contact:
This
is a fallacy born from the semi-contact form of ITF based competition.
In ITF competition sparring, contact is suppose to be controlled,
though in many of the competitions I have been in as a black belt,
the contact levels have varied between medium, to hard, to occasionally
full contact. The difference is the rules. The actual rules for
ITF competition state 'light contact' and it is really up to the
judge to enforce it. I have never gone into a fight in an ITF based
tournament and deliberately gone in with heavy contact. The problem
stems from the referees not enforcing rules properly and thus, if
an opponent went heavy on me and the referee didn't pull them up,
then I had no choice but to give as good as I got.
Those outside of Taekwon-do
simply see ITF based competition, with two opponents skilfully controlling
their techniques (and it is a skilful opponent that can fight fast
and intensely and still control their techniques, as those less
skilled rely simply on brute force) and summarize that this represents
Taekwon-do as a whole. The fact that in many dojangs, competition
sparring is the only sparring helps further promote this.
My good friend from Poland,
Piotr Bernat, has told me that most Polish competition sparring
is heavy and full contact and unlike WTF sparring, allows punches
to the head (Competitors wear the same protective equipment as in
any standard ITF based tournament) so even in competition, its not
strictly true.
Competition aside, in training
I have had many heavy contact sessions with fellow black belts.
Seniors in my classes spar from light to medium to heavy contact
and are also allowed to use take downs, sweeping, low kicks, trips
and throws at the same time, depending on the type of training we
are doing.
Hosinsol is often performed
with techniques at full power, but stopped short to avoid injury.
Obviously one cannot strike full contact to a vital point as it
would cause major damage to a fellow student, however the strikes
are thrown at full speed and intensity and blocks are often utilized
at close to full power unless hitting a joint or vital point.
The pattern applications
show the full contact state of Taekwon-do. Techniques are designed
to maim, kill or destroy an opponent and without full power, this
cannot be achieved, hence why patterns practice and more so, patterns
practice with visualization, is so essential to maintaining this
element.
Taekwon-do Contains
No Low Kicks:
Another
fallacy born from competition only sparring. Students are geared
to think they must always kick above the waist. And whilst this
is a good criteria for children, beginners and junior grade students,
due to their lack of targeting skills and control, it is not such
a major issue to a more skilled student who can chose when to hit
hard, where to strike and when to pull a technique for safety. The
problem exists and many clubs these days are so competition orientated
that they are never allow to blossom into this area which is vital
for a full rounded arsenal of techniques. The patterns themselves
contain low kicks, so students should be allowed the freedom to
train in areas that overlap. Patterns, sparring and hosinsol (self
defence) all overlap onto each other forming what is really Taekwon-do,
as each on their own are just parts of the whole.
Taekwon-do Doesn't
Allow Sweeping:
Again, another myth perpetrated
by competition and further enforced by schools that only concentrate
on competition sparring. Sweeping is as much a part of Taekwon-do
as kicking is. Again, even in controlled sparring, sweeping can
be practiced by more senior students. Again, the patterns incorporate
sweeping techniques, some which are obvious and other which are
not so obvious.
Taekwon-do Doesn't
Contain Locking Techniques:
Taekwon-do contains many
locks (and breaks) if we study properly. Early in its development
Taekwon-do incorporated elements of another Korean art, Hapkido,
including many of its joint locks. However, someone deemed much
of them either too long, too complicated or not instant enough so
they were discarded and those that were kept centred around being
quick to apply or causing a break and not just a lock. Many locking
techniques can be found within the patterns.
Taekwon-do
Doesn't Contain Throws:
The encyclopaedia of Taekwon-do
published by General Choi contains a whole section on throwing and
falling. This section contains throws such as hip throws, body drops,
even the classic inner thigh throw. If it's not being taught to
the student, it's not because it is not part of Taekwon-do. Deeper
inspection of the patterns also reveal many throwing techniques
as you will discover.
Taekwon-do Contains
Weapons:
Contrary to what you may
see in some Taekwon-do schools, Taekwon-do contains no weapons.
No weapons training and no weapons patterns. These are extra parts
brought in from the outside by instructors, some as a means of enhancing
their students' knowledge in martial arts, but often as a means
of hiding their lack of deeper knowledge and often as is the case
these days, simply to charge the students more money.
Taekwon-do was an art designed
for soldiers and soldiers carry guns. Taekwon-do was there if they
couldn't use their gun (rifle or bayonet) for one reason or another,
they didn't carry poles and sticks just in case they dropped their
rifles. However, Taekwon-do contains what I like to term 'anti-weapons'
techniques and training. These are techniques and applications specifically
designed against weapons such as knives, clubs, sticks, poles, bayonet
attacks and even against pistols. Many 'anti-weapons' applications
are found within the black belt patterns though a student gains
an introduction unwittingly as early on as Joong-Gun tul.
All the above 'Taekwon-do
doesn't contain.' myths are due to a lack of knowledge in certain
areas by instructors or simply because instructors left whomever
they were with before gaining a full appreciation of the art. Many
modern Taekwon-do books further support this myth by not showing
or even mentioning them.
Taekwon-do Patterns
Are Only For . (insert here):
Many
students are lead to believe that patterns are simply a form of
practice for balance, fitness, poise, technique, smoothness and
other reasons, totally disregarding the self defence aspects. Though
when asked to recite the definition of Tul (Patterns) they happily
stand there and say "Tul is a series of offensive and defensive
movements set in a logical sequence against one or move imaginary
opponents."! This is the standard definition of patterns that virtually
all students give but still it is ignored! A series of offensive
and defensive movements sounds like self defence to me! The word
'opponents' also implies the same!
In the Encyclopaedia, General
Choi states 'Patterns are various fundamental movements, most of
which represent either attack or defence techniques, set to a fixed
or logical sequence'. He further goes on to mention the other benefits
of practicing patterns, but before the extra benefits, it is stated
that patterns represent self defence techniques, set out logically
to aid the students practice, meaning the foremost purpose of patterns,
is the practice of self defence. Besides, does anyone really think
someone would spend forty plus years developing a system for balance,
poise etc and via so many exercises (i.e. the 24 patterns)!
I can see how some may form
the conclusion that there is little realistic self defence value
in patterns training. The reasons may be as follows:
1 - The lack of variety in
each movements as to its actual usage
2 - The lack of any application
beyond blocking and striking (with a few exceptions)
3 - The seemingly static
stances and pattern movements
4 - The basic applications
often shown
5 - The way patterns don't
seem to correlate to sparring
6 - The way they are taught
in standard classes (as just movements)
7 - The emphasis on technical
excellence for competitions
8 - The opinions of their
instructor/group/association, fellow students or other martial artists
This is further enhanced
by instructors and organisations, especially in regards to competition
and the emphasis placed on technical merit to win gold medals. The
spreading of Taekwon-do around the globe also has a part to play
in this, as General Choi's first concern was uniformity and this
is the way pattern seminars have been conducted the world over,
with little of no time being given to the self defence value.
Taekwon-do Patterns
Are For Historical Purposes:
Aside from the definition
of Tul, which clearly states that patterns are a form of self defence,
I cannot really believe that General Choi spent over forty years
creating something for historical purposes only. In relation to
the above, many feel they are unrealistic and these reasons have
led to the conclusion by some groups or instructors that the usage
and practice of patterns are for no more than historical purposes,
allowing them to spend less time on them and more time on getting
ready for tournaments etc. As a side note, General Choi was opposed
to tournaments as he felt they didn't show Taekwon-do in its proper
light and that parts of the art have to be changed or forfeited
to ensure the safety of the participants and to a large degree he
was right. Pattern performances really only show the shell and from
that, no one can tell if the egg inside is good or bad or even if
it has yolk at all! The focal point of patterns training today is
to excel in tournaments and the same is true with regards to sparring
being totally tournament based in many clubs - is it any wonder
the more underlying benefits of patterns have been almost phased
out!
Personally, I had a good
tournament career and feel they are both enjoyable and beneficial
to students. They even contain a few elements that overlap fighting
or self defence and are beneficial to this area as well, like adrenaline
management and confidence. But, competition sparring is not fighting
and training patterns solely for competition ensures the student
misses out on the real purpose of patterns and doesn't allow the
student to develop this area any further than stage 1 of patterns
training.
Patterns Training
Is Dead Training:
Some martial arts that place
no value on pattern practice also help to propagate this fallacy
by pointing out the above and claiming:
Patterns training is
rigid, static and dead training, as there are no resisting opponents:
Well they are if they are
looked at in that way and have no self defence value above learning
techniques and how to distribute power into them, but as you will
see, this is not the way it should be, was meant to be, or has to
be!
When you spar you do not
use the movements/techniques as they are in patterns:
Though this is debatable
depending on what you term sparring, as it is largely based on the
assumption that all Taekwon-do sparring is performed like competition
sparring. It also pertains to sparring being confused with fighting
or self defence, but as any self protection instructor will tell
you, competition based sparring is far removed from either self
defence or fighting.
Competition sparring is just
that - for competition. Traditional 'all in' sparring allows greater
use of the patterns movements, especially the ones listed in this
book, and is more akin to fighting than competition, but is still
not the exact environment where patterns are most suited as you
will see. This is also discussed in depth in my book "Ch'ang Hon
Taekwon-do Hae Sul: Real Applications To The ITF Patterns".
Patterns Don't Work:
Some 2000 years ago, Cicero,
a Roman orator listed the '6 Mistakes of Man'. Number 3 was 'Insisting
that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it.' It
is therefore feasible that though some may see little or no value
in the training of patterns it could simply be because they were
unable to make them work for them or more likely, were not willing
to invest the time and effort to do so, deciding to quit patterns
practice to concentrate on areas they felt were more beneficial.
This is not to say they were wrong, it was their path, it is however
wrong to denounce something just because you personally see no benefit
in it, even when others do. Others simply 'talk the talk' of their
instructors without ever actually knowing themselves as they have
started an art that has this ethos.
History however, speaks for
itself, as for every credible instructor that denounces patterns
as not working or as dead training, there are hundreds or more acknowledged
masters and highly regarded students that went before them, that
saw them as the complete opposite, enthused their benefits and trained
them to extremes, many of these masters are legends in the history
of martial arts but others still live and breathe, putting into
practice everyday the benefits of their arts patterns or kata, in
fact, one of the senior police trainers in Okinawa is an expert
in kata applications and this is how he teaches the officers under
him.
I have yet to hear of a highly
accomplished patterns or kata master, suddenly denouncing the training
of them and if they did, this would carry far more weight in my
mind than someone who has never placed a concerted effort into patterns
study or effort in training that area in the first place. Only one
who has in-depth knowledge of something in the first place can denounce
it as useless!
Making Patterns Come
Alive:
The problem is that often,
due possibly to the reasons mentioned above, that the patterns are
not studied or taken to the depth of training that they could be.
Students reach 1st or 2nd dan and feel they are advanced, whereas
1st degree is just the start of training, meaning the student has
a good grasp of the basics. The student then feels that patterns
are repetitive, or wonders what's the point of simply learning new
sets of movements with no basis and drifts towards competition or
sparring and finally feels they are a waste of time and effort,
simply doing them because they are a student in a Taekwon-do class,
to prepare for tournaments or in order to pass their next dan grade.
For some students, this is often short lived as they decide their
time could be better served in other areas of training. All this
can be rectified by following the training methods detailed in my
book "Ch'ang Hon Taekwon-do Hae Sul: Real Applications To The ITF
Patterns" and a new appreciation of the patterns can be gleamed,
as the real benefits of pattern training becomes apparent.
Reproduced from the book
"Ch'ang Hon Taekwon-do Hae Sul: Real Applications To The ITF Patterns"
with permission specifically for Iain Abernethy.
Copyright
© 2006 Stuart Paul Anslow
Back
to Articles Page |